|
|
Post by Pacifica on Jan 18, 2024 21:50:27 GMT
Under crooked Joe Biden, our borders, if you noticed—and I’m sure nobody’s noticed—our borders have been erased. They’ve been obliterated. We have people coming in. Millions and millions of people coming in. They’re coming in from prisons. They’re coming in from mental institutions. They’re terrorists. Millions of people are coming in that shouldn’t be here.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive 
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 18, 2024 21:52:46 GMT
This is definitely a word he likes (Crooked Hillary!) and I should've thought of it sooner.
I'll try to think of something new but if I can't I'll go back to Tom Sawyer.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 9:29:35 GMT
I have a friend who’s an ____ and has sometimes ____ a ____ which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a ____ and say “look how ____ it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an ____ can see how ____ this is but you as a ____ take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of ____. First of all, the ____ that he sees is ____ to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as ____ ____ as he is… I can appreciate the ____ of a ____. At the same time, I see much more about the ____ than he sees. I could imagine the ____ in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a ____. I mean it’s not just ____ at this ____, at one centimeter; there’s also ____ at smaller ____, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the ____ in the ____ evolved in order to attract ____ to ____ it is interesting; it means that ____ can see the ____. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower ____? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the ____ ____ only ____ to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a ____. It only ____. I don’t understand how it ____.
There's a considerable amount of repetition as you might imagine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifica on Jan 19, 2024 14:09:32 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes expressed a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of wrong. First of all, the flower that he sees is beautiful to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as artistically sensitive as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the sap in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this level, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller levels, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the pollen in the flower evolved in order to attract insects/bees to scatter it is interesting; it means that flowers can see the insects/bees/world. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower kingdoms? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the scientific mind only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only gains. I don’t understand how it loses.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:14:18 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes ____ a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of ____. First of all, the ____ that he sees is ____ to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as ____ ____ as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the ____ in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this ____, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller ____, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the ____ in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to ____ it is interesting; it means that ____ can see the ____. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower ____? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the ____ ____ only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only ____. I don’t understand how it ____. Well, good job! Various hints could be given.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifica on Jan 19, 2024 14:25:37 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes voiced a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of mistaken. First of all, the beauty that he sees is visible to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as poetically minded as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the structures in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this ____, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller ____, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the beauty in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to eat/visit it is interesting; it means that insects can see the beauty. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower ____? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the ____ scientist only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don’t understand how it detracts/removes.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:29:58 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes ____ a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of ____. First of all, the beauty that he sees is ____ to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as ____ ____ as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the ____ in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this ____, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller ____, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the beauty in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to ____ it is interesting; it means that insects can see the ____. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower ____? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the ____ ____ only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don’t understand how it ____.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:31:24 GMT
Various types of hints could still be given about both of your batches.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifica on Jan 19, 2024 14:40:16 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes ____ a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of ____. First of all, the beauty that he sees is apparent to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as romantically/aesthetically romantic/artistic/inclined as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this ____, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller scales, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the beauty in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to fertilize/pollinate it is interesting; it means that insects can see the aesthetics. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower brain? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the ____ ____ only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don’t understand how it subtracts.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:46:25 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes ____ a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of ____. First of all, the beauty that he sees is ____ to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as ____ aesthetically as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this ____, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller ____, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the beauty in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it is interesting; it means that insects can see the ____. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower ____? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the ____ ____ only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don’t understand how it subtracts.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:47:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifica on Jan 19, 2024 14:54:00 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes proferred a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of off/deluded/silly/incorrect. First of all, the beauty that he sees is obvious to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as talented/perceptive/developed aesthetically as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this scale, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller dimensions, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the beauty in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it is interesting; it means that insects can see the ____. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower ____? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the ____ science/aspect only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don’t understand how it subtracts.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:54:19 GMT
One word is very close, and the other, close. Right general idea anyway. |
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:54:46 GMT
Ninja'd; wait.
|
|
kizolk
Indecisive
Posts: 5,454
|
Post by kizolk on Jan 19, 2024 14:55:55 GMT
I have a friend who’s an artist and has sometimes ____ a view which I don’t agree with very well. He’ll hold up a flower and say “look how beautiful it is,” and I’ll agree. Then he says “I as an artist can see how beautiful this is but you as a scientist take this all apart and it becomes a dull thing,” and I think that he’s kind of ____. First of all, the beauty that he sees is ____ to other people and to me too, I believe. Although I may not be quite as ____ aesthetically as he is… I can appreciate the beauty of a flower. At the same time, I see much more about the flower than he sees. I could imagine the cells in there, the complicated actions inside, which also have a beauty. I mean it’s not just beauty at this ____, at one centimeter; there’s also beauty at smaller dimensions, the inner structure, also the processes. The fact that the beauty in the flower evolved in order to attract insects to pollinate it is interesting; it means that insects can see the ____. It adds a question: does this aesthetic sense also exist in the lower ____? Why is it aesthetic? All kinds of interesting questions which the science ____ only adds to the excitement, the mystery and the awe of a flower. It only adds. I don’t understand how it subtracts.
|
|
